A Journal of Mormon Scripture 5
A Journal of Mormon Scripture 5 Review of Rick Grunder. Discovering parallels is inherently an act of comparison. Through comparison, parallels have been introduced frequently as proof or evidence of different issues within Mormon studies.
Despite this frequency, very few investigations provide a theoretical or methodological framework by which the parallels themselves can be evaluated. This problem is not new to the field of Mormon studies but has in the past plagued literary studies more generally.
In Part One, this review essay discusses present and past approaches dealing with the ways in which parallels have been used and valued in acts of literary comparison, uncovering the various difficulties associated with unsorted parallels as well as discussing the underlying motivations for these comparisons.
In using a consistent methodology to value these parallels, this essay suggests a way to address the historical concerns associated with using parallels to explain both texts and Mormonism as an historical religious movement.
First I look at the problem of parallels. This context provides a useful starting point to examine the content of Mormon Parallels.
I will include some discussion of the intentions behind such a comparison and how these comparisons have been used in a polemic against the faith of the Saints. I will Harry potter thesis statements reference discussions critical of the use of parallels and more recent attempts to rehabilitate the practice.
I begin in Part One with a discussion of problematic assumptions in comparisons, and then in Part Two I turn to the flawed results of their use. My essay is an examination of the perils of what has been called parallelomania. Grunder is aware of this term see p.
But comparison is not a new endeavor, either for authors and their texts or for those studying religions. James Hanges has argued that the comparative choice is often made because the.
This is frequently the case when religion provides the backdrop against which the comparative choices are to be portrayed. The theoretical underpinning of this kind of comparison is the assumption that groups come into being because of the genius of a single individual—groups follow and preserve the teachings of extraordinary leaders.
And these comparisons are not just limited to the individual; they expand their reach to include the teachings of founder figures as they have been preserved by their followers. In surprising depth and degree, much of what Mormonism presents as if it were its own, actually flourished at various levels of society before Joseph Smith declared it.
Grunder makes comparisons involving Joseph Smith that fit into the theological backdrop of Mormonism. Arthur Marmorstein concluded his study by claiming that Jesus said nothing new.
I include this material for two major reasons. First, I wish to illustrate by example the idea of a history of the comparative method 7 used by Grunder. Whether this application is enlightening or misleading, however, will be shown to be an entirely separate question.
In this particular case, it is the person and the movement that make these comparisons seem both interesting and relevant. Yet, the process of identifying similarities in this way can be done for any person in any milieu — including even Grunder.
For Baldensperger, work on notable authors and texts was well underway — but it could only provide a partial understanding. The rest would come with the tedious examination of everything else. I believe the exercise of comparing Grunder with other texts, as he compares the writings of early [Page 7]Mormonism to other texts, will prove enlightening.
Most current discussions of parallels do in fact address this subject though Grunder does not. The first deals with what it means to compare things, why we compare them, and how we can appropriately use parallels once we find them. The second deals with the identification of parallels themselves—what constitutes valid or significant parallels, and how we identify them.
Having laid the groundwork with an account of the historical discussion of the comparative method, the second part deals with questions of methodology. Here I discuss the issues involved in identifying parallels, gauging significance, and so on.“In the general course of human nature, a power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.” —Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 79 Libertarianism is a philosophy of individual freedom.
Or so its adherents claim. But with their single-minded defense of the rights of property and. The goal of Sudoku is to fill in a 9×9 grid with digits so that each column, row, and 3×3 section contain the numbers between 1 to 9.
At the beginning of the game, . [This post was co-written by Chris Bertram, Corey Robin and Alex Gourevitch] “In the general course of human nature, a power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will.” —Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 79 Libertarianism is a philosophy of individual freedom.
benjaminpohle.com: As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary PreHistory of Virtual Reality (): Michael Saler: Books.
Hearst Television participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on purchases made through our links to retailer sites.
A comprehensive, coeducational Catholic High school Diocese of Wollongong - Albion Park Act Justly, love tenderly and walk humbly with your God Micah